title="Wordle: God and Rap">
alt="Wordle: God and Rap"
style="padding:4px;border:1px solid #ddd">
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Neat Image
This is from Wordle.net. It turns your blogposts into neat images. Check it out.
title="Wordle: God and Rap">
alt="Wordle: God and Rap"
style="padding:4px;border:1px solid #ddd">
title="Wordle: God and Rap">
alt="Wordle: God and Rap"
style="padding:4px;border:1px solid #ddd">
The Call
Well, I don't know how all this is going to come out, but what the hey, I'll just go ahead and do it.
So, here's the deal. I'll be graduating in December. I'm pretty stoked about that. I need to finish my thesis and a few more hours of classes, but other than that, I'll be good to go. And to be honest, I'm still on the fence about the ole Ph.D. I mean, yeah, it'd be nice to be called "Dr. Tully," and hang out in classes and seminars for another 3 years or so. But to be honest, I'm about 50/50 about even starting such an attempt. I know I like school and have a natural aptitude for it, but there's something more in play.
While searching for ideas to fill up the ominous sounding "Lost Semester," (so named because while I graduate in December, Ph. D programs don't start until the fall, hence a "lost" semester in which I will not be in class) an idea began in ferment in my mind. Initially, I was looking at either moving to Texas in order to establish residency for UT (long story) or going to D.C. to start work as a corporate archivist (which is pretty well paying and requires experience as both historian and librarian, each of which I have in spades). However, as time went on, another possibility thrust itself into the forefront of my mind.
At this time, I'm going to go into a little bit about my past and why this is a little shameful to be me. If you aren't interested in hearing about this, go ahead and skip the next two paragraphs. Don't worry, I won't judge you.
Okay here's the deal, I feel like I've been Jonah for the past 9 years or so. Not the belly of the whale part, but the fleeing from Nineveh bit. Whenever I was about 15/16 I got called to do foreign missions in some capacity. Specifically Youth ministry. And since that time, I've been trying to run away from it. My excuses are multi-fold: That it was just a one night reaction, that it wasn't real in the first place, I'm more suited and gifted in other areas, my past prevents me from such an endeavour, it wasn't actually God in the first place, there's no money in it, what would people think of me, etc etc ad nausem.
Because of my own uncertainites, I've put this off for too long. Denied it. Tried covering it up with other activities and accomplishments. And it's not like God hasn't blessed me in my lack of obedence. Far from it. I consider myself the luckiest man on the planet to be so liberally blessed the way I am. But there's something I want above all other things (Well, two things to be exact) and I know in order to get them, I'll have to submit myself to this. Will it be easy? Probably not. Will it worth it? Most certainly.
Anyway, I've always had an interest in going to New Zealand for an extended period to live/work/serve. Something about that country has grabbed me like no other place has. It looks not only idyllic in its scenery, but the people as well. The Maori. The climate. All sorts of things which reaffirm its worth. It seems like the place where nature and people got it right.
Long story short, I decided that going to New Zealand for a semester at the very least would be the best course of action for me. I contacted a number of churches, and got some very nice responses. In short, if all goes to plan, I will be working at a church in Wellington as a, well not exact sure what. It's above an intern, but below staff. It's not quite a mission trip, since the people of New Zealand have long heard of Jesus and Christianity; but it isn't just an extended vacation. My primary reason to go to New Zealand is to serve the people in whatever capacity God allows. It's just ironic the one church that is the most responsive to me is in need for someone to head up their youth ministry. God defintely has a sense of humor.
It's almost like I'm backing into what God has wanted me to do for years since I can't face it head on. And it's probably my reluctance and distaste for certain aspects which makes me more qualified to do it. I do not seek this type of life, but it has found me irregardless. I know I have been meant to do this for a long while now, I'm just coming to grips with the reality of the situation.
So to recap. Stu in Wellington, NZ. From January 2010-to who knows?
So, here's the deal. I'll be graduating in December. I'm pretty stoked about that. I need to finish my thesis and a few more hours of classes, but other than that, I'll be good to go. And to be honest, I'm still on the fence about the ole Ph.D. I mean, yeah, it'd be nice to be called "Dr. Tully," and hang out in classes and seminars for another 3 years or so. But to be honest, I'm about 50/50 about even starting such an attempt. I know I like school and have a natural aptitude for it, but there's something more in play.
While searching for ideas to fill up the ominous sounding "Lost Semester," (so named because while I graduate in December, Ph. D programs don't start until the fall, hence a "lost" semester in which I will not be in class) an idea began in ferment in my mind. Initially, I was looking at either moving to Texas in order to establish residency for UT (long story) or going to D.C. to start work as a corporate archivist (which is pretty well paying and requires experience as both historian and librarian, each of which I have in spades). However, as time went on, another possibility thrust itself into the forefront of my mind.
At this time, I'm going to go into a little bit about my past and why this is a little shameful to be me. If you aren't interested in hearing about this, go ahead and skip the next two paragraphs. Don't worry, I won't judge you.
Okay here's the deal, I feel like I've been Jonah for the past 9 years or so. Not the belly of the whale part, but the fleeing from Nineveh bit. Whenever I was about 15/16 I got called to do foreign missions in some capacity. Specifically Youth ministry. And since that time, I've been trying to run away from it. My excuses are multi-fold: That it was just a one night reaction, that it wasn't real in the first place, I'm more suited and gifted in other areas, my past prevents me from such an endeavour, it wasn't actually God in the first place, there's no money in it, what would people think of me, etc etc ad nausem.
Because of my own uncertainites, I've put this off for too long. Denied it. Tried covering it up with other activities and accomplishments. And it's not like God hasn't blessed me in my lack of obedence. Far from it. I consider myself the luckiest man on the planet to be so liberally blessed the way I am. But there's something I want above all other things (Well, two things to be exact) and I know in order to get them, I'll have to submit myself to this. Will it be easy? Probably not. Will it worth it? Most certainly.
Anyway, I've always had an interest in going to New Zealand for an extended period to live/work/serve. Something about that country has grabbed me like no other place has. It looks not only idyllic in its scenery, but the people as well. The Maori. The climate. All sorts of things which reaffirm its worth. It seems like the place where nature and people got it right.
Long story short, I decided that going to New Zealand for a semester at the very least would be the best course of action for me. I contacted a number of churches, and got some very nice responses. In short, if all goes to plan, I will be working at a church in Wellington as a, well not exact sure what. It's above an intern, but below staff. It's not quite a mission trip, since the people of New Zealand have long heard of Jesus and Christianity; but it isn't just an extended vacation. My primary reason to go to New Zealand is to serve the people in whatever capacity God allows. It's just ironic the one church that is the most responsive to me is in need for someone to head up their youth ministry. God defintely has a sense of humor.
It's almost like I'm backing into what God has wanted me to do for years since I can't face it head on. And it's probably my reluctance and distaste for certain aspects which makes me more qualified to do it. I do not seek this type of life, but it has found me irregardless. I know I have been meant to do this for a long while now, I'm just coming to grips with the reality of the situation.
So to recap. Stu in Wellington, NZ. From January 2010-to who knows?
Friday, February 27, 2009
Some Musings on Suckiness
So this past week or so has been pretty trying down here in Tullyville. Aside from the continual thesis expansion and research, which I'm pretty used to if I'm completely honest, there has been one major issue dominating my waking and sleeping hours. Without getting into too much detail, considering the sensitivities of the situation (if you really want to know what's going on, just ask me in real life. I'm not comfortable going the whole nine yards in blog form.), I'll just say it's a distance issue coupled with extenuating circumstances beyond anyone's control. I really hope the circumstance changes, but it's looking grim. I really was looking forward to no funerals this year.
But it all got me thinking, do people actually realize the amount of cruelity they can place on another? Part of me hopes that it's inadvertent. But then again, I can't imagine anyone being that heartless. Sure, we can't all go around wearing our heart on our sleeve, and telling everyone our drama, but there has to be a level of grace extended. Times get tough, things are changing non-stop. Is it too much to ask another human to stay stable, even if they don't mean it, just so we have something to hang on to? Our world is crashing down and everything is in flux; but when we go to the people we depend upon, the ones who swore they'd be there for us, the ones we were there for whenever they couldn't handle life, we don't get the same kindness extended to us. They claim they're the same individual, and that nothing has changed, but it has. They're being distant and engaging in jerkwad behavior. The ones that you called your best friend, the ones who you thought there was a future with, they're now the ones who are doing things you wouldn't do to someone you hated. And what's even worse is that they're making you feel like the guilty party. Like you did something wrong by, oh I don't know, reeling with the loss that will rock your world forever.
But enough about that. For the record, I'm not the one going through the situation, but I am the emotional rock for someone who is. And let me tell you, it's way harder than I expected. To see someone you care about hurt so deeply, and know there's not a dang thing you can do about it. And even worse, as hard as you try to be there for them, but geography still separates you. I don't mind taking the 2 am phone calls, or giving the reassurances that things will eventually change; but you always feel like you're not giving it all.
The one thing I've certainly learned is how necessary it is to take of yourself as you act as the stability for another. It can be draining and all consuming, and it's pretty easy to neglect yourself. So as hollow as it seems right now, not to mention the passing guilt of having at such a time, I've been doing my best to ensure I stay sane. Yes, I've been revising the same 4-page thesis proposal for the past week or more, and no, I'm still not happy with it. But hey, it's something I like to do. If it wasn't for that, I'd probably be fretting about the situation.
But man, it still sucks.
But it all got me thinking, do people actually realize the amount of cruelity they can place on another? Part of me hopes that it's inadvertent. But then again, I can't imagine anyone being that heartless. Sure, we can't all go around wearing our heart on our sleeve, and telling everyone our drama, but there has to be a level of grace extended. Times get tough, things are changing non-stop. Is it too much to ask another human to stay stable, even if they don't mean it, just so we have something to hang on to? Our world is crashing down and everything is in flux; but when we go to the people we depend upon, the ones who swore they'd be there for us, the ones we were there for whenever they couldn't handle life, we don't get the same kindness extended to us. They claim they're the same individual, and that nothing has changed, but it has. They're being distant and engaging in jerkwad behavior. The ones that you called your best friend, the ones who you thought there was a future with, they're now the ones who are doing things you wouldn't do to someone you hated. And what's even worse is that they're making you feel like the guilty party. Like you did something wrong by, oh I don't know, reeling with the loss that will rock your world forever.
But enough about that. For the record, I'm not the one going through the situation, but I am the emotional rock for someone who is. And let me tell you, it's way harder than I expected. To see someone you care about hurt so deeply, and know there's not a dang thing you can do about it. And even worse, as hard as you try to be there for them, but geography still separates you. I don't mind taking the 2 am phone calls, or giving the reassurances that things will eventually change; but you always feel like you're not giving it all.
The one thing I've certainly learned is how necessary it is to take of yourself as you act as the stability for another. It can be draining and all consuming, and it's pretty easy to neglect yourself. So as hollow as it seems right now, not to mention the passing guilt of having at such a time, I've been doing my best to ensure I stay sane. Yes, I've been revising the same 4-page thesis proposal for the past week or more, and no, I'm still not happy with it. But hey, it's something I like to do. If it wasn't for that, I'd probably be fretting about the situation.
But man, it still sucks.
Friday, February 20, 2009
What I Believe
What the hey, I'll throw in a second post for the price of one. So I wrote this a while ago, probably during the summer, after I was disgusted by a lot of the brow-beating of various differences in Christianity. I mean, really minor theological disputes which have no bearing on our actual lives and faith. Furthermore, it sickened me to see people trying to claim supernatural backing for their private point of view. Anyway, I decided for once and for all to make a synthesis of what all I believe. It's not to cast a dim shadow on anyone who believes otherwise. Rather, it was an exercise I needed to do. I'm not claiming this is the nature of God, or the way things are, this is simply what I believe in my heart.
What do I believe?
- I believe in God, the creator of all. While his methods are unknown, I believe he used them deliberately.
- I believe in an ancient earth, where God took his time to perfect his creation.
- I believe in Jesus, an aspect of God who came to earth die for our sins. I believe Jesus was human, as well as divine.
- I believe Jesus did not know the outcome of his life, nor all the individual thoughts of those around him. (For instance, I personally like Jesus to be dumb-founded by the Roman Centurion's faith. And that he took a risk by coming to earth to die for our sins. It wasn't all set in stone)
- I believe in the Holy Spirit, an element of God that is it utterly consumed with accomplishing God’s will.
- I believe God’s ultimate desire will be done, human involvement cannot impede it.
- I believe in the trinity, God in three forms. I believe give praise to one element of the trinity gives praise to all.
- I believe Jesus fulfilled all the messianic prophecy, even the seemingly contradictory stuff.
- I believe the Bible was divinely inspired, but the product of human endeavor. Each author left a part of their personality in their work.
- I believe the Bible is easily the most reputable of ancient text, and its integrity is proved by the sheer amount of manuscripts.
- I believe the Bible does not have to be taken literally. It contains allegory, allusions, and prophecy. As such, the full depth of its meaning cannot be taken by face value alone.
- I believe there is no hierarchy of Christians; differences in doctrine do not denote further discord. We should focus on the similar rather than the differences.
- I believe personal revelation will never contradict scripture. Furthermore, all personal revelations should be evaluated severally before implementation.
- I believe God is not limited by scripture; he can do thinks beyond what is already laid out. However, it will never be totally contrary
- I believe Satan exists. However, he is a defeated spirit. His power has been severally weakened and does not pose a major threat to believers when they resist. I believe death was the true enemy.
- I believe human weakness, failures, and temptation are the result of human nature, not supernatural malevolence.
- I believe Christians have a responsibility to correct societal ills; to be Christ’s hands and feet in his tangible absence.
- I believe Biblical speaking in tongues refers to the expansion of Christ’s gospel to the nations. That being said, speaking in tongues is not a requirement for belief, or a sign of further submission. Christianity is not segmented.
- I believe humans can never fully understand God’s nature, but that is no reason why it shouldn’t be sought. Seeking and learning about God is a lifetime adventure.
- I believe in free will. An individual must personally chose to accept God’s dominion over their life.
- I believe if a person truly means their conversion, there is no way circumstances can remove this salvation.
- I believe God has the ability to save whoever he wants, but chooses not to force the issue as he wants our love for him to be given willfully.
- I believe everyone will be judged for their actions, but Christ’s love will save those who believe.
- I believe salvation is deceptively simple. A true admission of Jesus’ truth will result in salvation.
- I believe in heaven, but it should not be our focus in light of the current work we have right now.
- I believe baptism is an outward expression of what God has already accomplished. I believe in both infant baptism and water baptism once a person realizes the extent of their belief.
- I do not believe conversion has to be an individual moment in time; it can also be a lengthy and mental process. I believe the Bible is intellectual; intellect and spirituality are not mutually exclusive terms.
- I believe the rapture can occur at any time, and it has been that way since Jesus’ departure. While we may be living in the end times due to the passage of time, it is not impending this very second.
- I believe communion should be open to all, since we are one under God. I believe communion is an opportunity to remember Christ’s sacrifice for us.
- I believe worship is a personal expression. However, communal worship allows for espier de corps otherwise not found in private devotion.
- I believe pastors are men, and aside from their choice in vocation, no different than any other believer. Furthermore, strong discretion must be used when first approaching any individual claiming supernatural leadership.
- I believe unnecessary claiming of spiritual rationale results in weakening both the speaker and the name of God, violating both the 3rd Commandment and Jesus’ command to ‘let your yes be yes and your no be no’.
- I believe as Christians, we are called out of the spiritual ghetto into being lights for the world. As such, Christian should never be an apologetic adjective for our efforts.
- I believe God calls us not to be perfect, but excellent, better than we otherwise might be without his aid.
- I believe all denominations cherry pick elements of scripture. No one truly treats the entire Bible with the same emphasis. Though all believe the Bible to be relevant and holy, none has the moral superiority as “true believers.”
- I believe in fellowship and brotherhood as the closest glimpses of heaven we will ever see on earth.
- I believe our past is behind us. Though it strongly influenced the person we are today, it has no bearing on our future endeavors.
- I believe homosexuality no worse than any other sin, or abortion for that matter.
- I believe sin is not just an action, but an attitude of placing ourselves before God. All actions flow through his mindset.
- I believe marriage is a deep commitment, the second deepest we make on earth. However, the two must be able to function as individuals. The commitment is stronger between two wholes, rather than any with deficiency.
- I believe children are neat, but not mandated. The choice not to have children is perfectly acceptable. Likewise, the choice to remain single is also acceptable.
-I believe even though some might disagree with elements of my beliefs, we are still Christians. “The little stupid differences are nothing next to the big stupid similarities.”
What do I believe?
- I believe in God, the creator of all. While his methods are unknown, I believe he used them deliberately.
- I believe in an ancient earth, where God took his time to perfect his creation.
- I believe in Jesus, an aspect of God who came to earth die for our sins. I believe Jesus was human, as well as divine.
- I believe Jesus did not know the outcome of his life, nor all the individual thoughts of those around him. (For instance, I personally like Jesus to be dumb-founded by the Roman Centurion's faith. And that he took a risk by coming to earth to die for our sins. It wasn't all set in stone)
- I believe in the Holy Spirit, an element of God that is it utterly consumed with accomplishing God’s will.
- I believe God’s ultimate desire will be done, human involvement cannot impede it.
- I believe in the trinity, God in three forms. I believe give praise to one element of the trinity gives praise to all.
- I believe Jesus fulfilled all the messianic prophecy, even the seemingly contradictory stuff.
- I believe the Bible was divinely inspired, but the product of human endeavor. Each author left a part of their personality in their work.
- I believe the Bible is easily the most reputable of ancient text, and its integrity is proved by the sheer amount of manuscripts.
- I believe the Bible does not have to be taken literally. It contains allegory, allusions, and prophecy. As such, the full depth of its meaning cannot be taken by face value alone.
- I believe there is no hierarchy of Christians; differences in doctrine do not denote further discord. We should focus on the similar rather than the differences.
- I believe personal revelation will never contradict scripture. Furthermore, all personal revelations should be evaluated severally before implementation.
- I believe God is not limited by scripture; he can do thinks beyond what is already laid out. However, it will never be totally contrary
- I believe Satan exists. However, he is a defeated spirit. His power has been severally weakened and does not pose a major threat to believers when they resist. I believe death was the true enemy.
- I believe human weakness, failures, and temptation are the result of human nature, not supernatural malevolence.
- I believe Christians have a responsibility to correct societal ills; to be Christ’s hands and feet in his tangible absence.
- I believe Biblical speaking in tongues refers to the expansion of Christ’s gospel to the nations. That being said, speaking in tongues is not a requirement for belief, or a sign of further submission. Christianity is not segmented.
- I believe humans can never fully understand God’s nature, but that is no reason why it shouldn’t be sought. Seeking and learning about God is a lifetime adventure.
- I believe in free will. An individual must personally chose to accept God’s dominion over their life.
- I believe if a person truly means their conversion, there is no way circumstances can remove this salvation.
- I believe God has the ability to save whoever he wants, but chooses not to force the issue as he wants our love for him to be given willfully.
- I believe everyone will be judged for their actions, but Christ’s love will save those who believe.
- I believe salvation is deceptively simple. A true admission of Jesus’ truth will result in salvation.
- I believe in heaven, but it should not be our focus in light of the current work we have right now.
- I believe baptism is an outward expression of what God has already accomplished. I believe in both infant baptism and water baptism once a person realizes the extent of their belief.
- I do not believe conversion has to be an individual moment in time; it can also be a lengthy and mental process. I believe the Bible is intellectual; intellect and spirituality are not mutually exclusive terms.
- I believe the rapture can occur at any time, and it has been that way since Jesus’ departure. While we may be living in the end times due to the passage of time, it is not impending this very second.
- I believe communion should be open to all, since we are one under God. I believe communion is an opportunity to remember Christ’s sacrifice for us.
- I believe worship is a personal expression. However, communal worship allows for espier de corps otherwise not found in private devotion.
- I believe pastors are men, and aside from their choice in vocation, no different than any other believer. Furthermore, strong discretion must be used when first approaching any individual claiming supernatural leadership.
- I believe unnecessary claiming of spiritual rationale results in weakening both the speaker and the name of God, violating both the 3rd Commandment and Jesus’ command to ‘let your yes be yes and your no be no’.
- I believe as Christians, we are called out of the spiritual ghetto into being lights for the world. As such, Christian should never be an apologetic adjective for our efforts.
- I believe God calls us not to be perfect, but excellent, better than we otherwise might be without his aid.
- I believe all denominations cherry pick elements of scripture. No one truly treats the entire Bible with the same emphasis. Though all believe the Bible to be relevant and holy, none has the moral superiority as “true believers.”
- I believe in fellowship and brotherhood as the closest glimpses of heaven we will ever see on earth.
- I believe our past is behind us. Though it strongly influenced the person we are today, it has no bearing on our future endeavors.
- I believe homosexuality no worse than any other sin, or abortion for that matter.
- I believe sin is not just an action, but an attitude of placing ourselves before God. All actions flow through his mindset.
- I believe marriage is a deep commitment, the second deepest we make on earth. However, the two must be able to function as individuals. The commitment is stronger between two wholes, rather than any with deficiency.
- I believe children are neat, but not mandated. The choice not to have children is perfectly acceptable. Likewise, the choice to remain single is also acceptable.
-I believe even though some might disagree with elements of my beliefs, we are still Christians. “The little stupid differences are nothing next to the big stupid similarities.”
Can I Get an Encore
So, it's been a long time since I last wrote something. And instead of telling you what all has gone on lately, I suppose I can just show you.
So yeah, thesis is without a doubt the number one, and pretty much only thing going on in my life right now (except for a certain person calling me "Hebibi" but that's another story for another time ;)) And since research, reading, and summarizing have taken over my entire life, I suppose the only thing I have to give is this, a rambling, rumbling, stumbling stream of consciousness dribble that is the mental backbone of my thesis. I share this only in a vain hope someone might actually read it and figure out what the heck I mean. Ready? Okay.
Run DMC has iconic status, and I mean that in the purest sense of the word. Elements of their on-stage persona have transcended the mere physical and have become emblematic of the era in hip hop. For instance, the all-black leather suits, the black fedoras, the two turn-tables and microphones, the minimalist style, etc. Furthermore, Run DMC set the standard for many of what rappers were “supposed to look like.” This is due to their exposure to the mainstream audience. They were not the first rappers by any stretch, however, they became first rappers to be seen outside of New York on a wide-scale.
In addition, because of Run DMC’s heightened exposure, their visual appearance became the major manner in which they could be emulated. While distinct, their style was fairly easily obtainable. They looked like ordinary individuals, and fairly free of flash. Run DMC exposure was what lead to the end of the “old school artists,” and the heavy disco feel of early rap records.
So why was Run-DMC so successful in crossing over to the mainstream? Of course, many elements have to be taken into account. But, a lot of credit is due to Russell Simmons. He influenced and directed the group, particularly keenly in the early years. Russell produced, made fashion decisions, portioned out rhymes, and got the group onto the radio. Russell Simmons saw the big picture, in the financial sense. As part of Simmons financial savvy, he made/suggest/threatened/whatever the group to make “My Adidas,” which had a lot of potential to be a ripe plum of an endorsement deal for the group. Run-DMC had national exposure, but was about to break into a larger realm with the new record. “Krush Groove,” Live Aid, the fact they already had two videos on MTV, all of which aided giving the group credibility.
The song exists on multiple levels. Of course, it shows the group being true to their roots, but in addition, it speaks directly to Adidas as to why the group, and the song for that matter, would be a great medium to sink their money into. For instance, it mentions Live Aid, the number of concerts the group puts on, their favorite colors, and the admiration of a homeboy who owns several pairs of shoes. It mentions the name Adidas nearly 22 times.
This little bit of entrepanuerialism aided both parties. Run-DMC got even more mainstream acceptance, while Adidas got precedence in the urban market. It was also a very long lasting deal, one that became iconic for both parties. But in addition, it also allowed the listeners of the music to buy into the product. Wearing Adidas shoes without laces became a manner to show solidarity with not just Run-DMC, but the hip hop community as a whole. It was no longer just music that was for sale, but a lifestyle to boot. This played right into Russell Simmon’s eventual emergence into Phat Farm and other endeavors, while staying away from the actual music scene (He supposedly admitted current music trends have long since passed him by). But, he’s promoting a lifestyle, one that he claims is moving away from youth counter-culture, and into the mainstream. Indeed, he claims Phat Farm is more up-scale. What kids who like rap would wear once they grew up, but refuse to adopt suits and ties (once again, his words, not mine). However, regardless of the aesthetic, he is using the principles which helped him achieve success with Run-DMC and Def Jam in the first place.
It is interesting Simmons’ personal definition of hip hop includes the phrase “mainstream culture.” However, judging by his current activities, it makes sense. His importance placed upon branding and maintaining product integrity is more akin to a Donald Trump than an opportunistic hype man. Once again, his retroactive justification of his past activities through current credo fits into traditional American economic activities.
Another defining of terms: traditional American economic values. Or aspirations, rather than values. Entrepanerialism, for one. The idea an individual, through sheer determination, skill, and luck, can carve out a better life for themselves. It also links to coming from authentic poverty or a legit bad situation, which makes their elevation all the more impressive. Though both Simmons’ came from a comfortable two parent working class existence, albeit quite black, it was nowhere near as desperate as other places. Indeed, Run-DMC rapped often of going to school and staying away from street activities. However, they always prefaced their rhymes by “knowing where the bad stuff went on.” Though they weren’t gangsters, they came to embody the persona of what the nation feared. For instance they were held responsible for the Long Beach incident even though they hadn’t yet gone on stage, and had to defend their lyrics, mainly from Kurtis Blow, who was disgruntled in the first place.
Anyway, another traditional American value personified by Simmons is self-actualization. Because of the sheer emphasis placed upon the appearance, it was clear Simmons was not just fashioning himself as a successful individual, but the groups he managed as well. It was easier to claim success already rather than “pay your dues” as the case may be. It also fits quite well into hip hop’s overall element of bragging and not actually just doing something. For instance, a rapper can use an entire song to rap about how hard he’s going to hit you or how smooth his rhymes are, while all the while proving his point. It’s almost a narrative (out of the time period, but “Can’t Nobody Do It Better” by Keith Murray springs to mine. He calls himself a gifted lyricist rather than letting someone else do it.) I guess that’s the other part of the whole Protestant work ethic and self-realization element of rap, you heap praises upon yourself instead of waiting for someone else. So even though they were claiming hard work and hustling, all they were doing is claiming it, not actually doing it. However, because of the success they found by already claiming prior success, their claims got validation. I see the parallel to Buffalo Bill wherein he became the standard by all other Wild West cowboys were measured by, even though he wasn’t actually a part of the Wild West scene. It’s all about claiming, getting first dibs on the experience. It’s a very personal and immensely competitive field, as exemplified by battle rapping being central to the music’s culture. Interestingly enough, Run-DMC was not engaged in any major rap feuds, but the contention between themselves and the whole Russell dynamic could substitute. Also, the claim LL Cool J copied their style.
So mix this whole brew together and it only seems like a manner of time before a Russell Simmons would fuse the music with economics and make himself personally wealthy. Sure the artists he managed didn’t have the best deals. And he took a lot of creative control over them. Plus, there was a lot of resentment for his control over Run DMC even though they were signed with another label. But Russell needed Run-DMC, since that was his bread and butter for a long time. It allowed him to make Def-Jam, and Phat Farm, and his whole empire. His name as a business icon is pretty much due to Run-DMC. (Insert that quote by Run that Run-DMC actually had five members: Run, DMC, Jam Master Jay, Russell, and God.)
But it all stems from his involvement with Run-DMC and Def Jam. It’s also funny how those two have become so linked, even though Run-DMC was never on Def Jam, but in the collective consciousness, a lot of people just assume that’s where Run-DMC was. So what made this deal with Adidas so important? Well, I’m arguing it’s what made Russell Simmons truly break that wall. It was not just widespread exposure, but also a level of acceptance as well. It was quite a bit of money, sure. Most of the money went to Russell, but that’s to be expected. However, it wasn’t just exposure of the band; it was exposure of the band as a brand. It allowed a much higher level of visibility and availability for people to buy into the hip hop lifestyle. That’s what really sustained them; it wasn’t just the music, but the manner by which people could tangibly identify with the music and the culture. And it was mainstream, that’s the beauty of it. Adidas was not primarily a urban lifestyles company, nor did the deal change their direction that much (indeed, they’re still primarily known as athletic and soccer equipment, not that huge of an urban following aside from nostalgia for Run DMC. That’s another big point, Run-DMC and Adidas are pretty much only synonymous with each other. Sure, Adidas has sponsored other rappers, and Run spends a lot of his time hawking Phat Farm shoes, but there isn’t the same connection with any other product. It truly is unique in that regard). But the deal with Run-DMC opened up the urban market to Adidas, and the mainstream market to Run-DMC. It was a perfectly mutually beneficial deal; neither side got the short end of that stick. A uniquely win-win all around.
The particulars of the deal are also influenced by the purposeful misremembering of history. For instance, current interviews by DMC claim Run’s exclamation to call for the taking off of the audience’s Adidas to be unique to the Madison Square Garden concert, while information at the time is fairly persuasive in arguing it was a regular bit of their shows, and that it had been filmed in Philadelphia by Lyor Cohen and sent to Adidas. Also, DMC mentions Russell, inspired by Run’s improvisation to quickly run and hustle an endorsement deal. This actually fits the hip hop practice of claiming an actually lengthy action was easy (and counter-intuitive, since rappers like to claim their extreme work ethic when things hadn’t happened yet. It’s pretty much a purposeful reversal of reality). The narrative works better if it’s Russell who scores the Adidas deal, not members of his Rush Management team. The participants are probably well aware of the effectiveness of the story and have in time; either willfully or subconsciously altered the tale of the endorsement so it becomes a much larger and clearer event. At the writing of their official biography, there was no idea the deal with Adidas would become so iconic, so it wasn’t treated that relevantly. However, as time passed, the event became much more singular. It was the world’s greatest arena, in their hometown, and it was spur of the moment, a much better story.
This idea is the least expanded upon, but it would probably get to how rappers now will mention products in their songs and get some what disappointed when they aren’t paid. Also, it’s how some companies try to get away from appealing to urban markets. It’s an interesting concept, but it needs to be expanded. Alright, let’s take this expansion of the thesis another direction. Russell Simmons is already the preliminary figure in the “My Adidas” aspect, in that it’s actually about his management style at Rush management. What if we expanded into Def Jam and Phat Farm, which were two extensions of his prowess with the hip hop market? Granted, Def Jam is a concurrent development with Run-DMC, but it mixes in Rick Rubin, and also builds on his reputation. Indeed, even though the two were never truly linked, the assumption was there. But his hands on management style was pretty key to the label’s success, but also its challenges. Artists weren’t exactly appreciative of his taking all their money. Indeed, I remember complaints how it seemed Russell had his hands into everything, as if all his hands were taking all your cut. In his defense, he claimed the big record companies were taking his. But still, it might be interesting to expand in the thesis into
criticism of Russell’s style. Big example, Jay always had problems with the IRS. Even after his murder, money had to be raised to pay off his house and provide for his kids’ education. And it was a public fund-raiser, even though Russell and Lyor could have easily cut a check. Furthermore, why was he in this predicament in the first place? Most people claim he was never flashy, and the material he had was modest considering someone of his fame. But if Run-DMC was such a success, should he have been paid? Also, Jay was signed to Def Jam, but Run and DMC were on Profile. Perhaps Jay got less lucrative deal? It’s amazing how the artists represented by Simmons and on Def Jam would never straight up criticize his taking a large cut, but the resentment is there. Of course, isn’t that every artist and their management? Ronin Ro suggests Russell was simply doing the best he could with the current situation. And there’s an element of truth to that, I suppose. There was no precedence for getting rap truly out there to a widespread mainstream audience. Plus, if you get down to it, pretty much any regional rap that developed outside of New York was due to these artists getting very wide exposure. It seems simple, but the most mainstream artists had the most effect. Sure, the “sell outs” might have been inspired by the Busy Bees and Kool Moe Dees of the world, but since they got the widest exposure first, they became the originators.
But all that exposure comes from Russell’s desire to make himself wealthy, to be frank. And that’s not a bad thing. Heck, it’s a very American thing to do. America is all about presenting itself as the land of opportunity; and Russell Simmons probably bought into that myth pretty hard. As such, it provides justification for a lot of his more selfish actions. It also fits into a greater American narrative. He’s a success story; he came from nothing to make something that most people were giving away for free. But the beauty of it comes in that it’s a self-told success story. He’s the guy guiding his narrative. As such, he’d be very image conscious, as evidenced by his branding and attention to visual appearance. And that’s why clothing makes such a likely extension of his branding.
Clothing isn’t as open to interpretation as other elements. It’s very appearance based, but it makes sense, since it’s linked to commercialization and product placement. His name became the product, hence why they call Phat Farm an urban lifestyles company, not a rap music clothing label. But judging by Russell’s attempt to ensure a Phat Farm racing jacket wouldn’t be worn by bums, he tries to be purposefully limiting.
So yeah, that's what it is now. All about economics and self-actualization through branding. I'll be really surprised if anyone actually reads this.
So yeah, thesis is without a doubt the number one, and pretty much only thing going on in my life right now (except for a certain person calling me "Hebibi" but that's another story for another time ;)) And since research, reading, and summarizing have taken over my entire life, I suppose the only thing I have to give is this, a rambling, rumbling, stumbling stream of consciousness dribble that is the mental backbone of my thesis. I share this only in a vain hope someone might actually read it and figure out what the heck I mean. Ready? Okay.
Run DMC has iconic status, and I mean that in the purest sense of the word. Elements of their on-stage persona have transcended the mere physical and have become emblematic of the era in hip hop. For instance, the all-black leather suits, the black fedoras, the two turn-tables and microphones, the minimalist style, etc. Furthermore, Run DMC set the standard for many of what rappers were “supposed to look like.” This is due to their exposure to the mainstream audience. They were not the first rappers by any stretch, however, they became first rappers to be seen outside of New York on a wide-scale.
In addition, because of Run DMC’s heightened exposure, their visual appearance became the major manner in which they could be emulated. While distinct, their style was fairly easily obtainable. They looked like ordinary individuals, and fairly free of flash. Run DMC exposure was what lead to the end of the “old school artists,” and the heavy disco feel of early rap records.
So why was Run-DMC so successful in crossing over to the mainstream? Of course, many elements have to be taken into account. But, a lot of credit is due to Russell Simmons. He influenced and directed the group, particularly keenly in the early years. Russell produced, made fashion decisions, portioned out rhymes, and got the group onto the radio. Russell Simmons saw the big picture, in the financial sense. As part of Simmons financial savvy, he made/suggest/threatened/whatever the group to make “My Adidas,” which had a lot of potential to be a ripe plum of an endorsement deal for the group. Run-DMC had national exposure, but was about to break into a larger realm with the new record. “Krush Groove,” Live Aid, the fact they already had two videos on MTV, all of which aided giving the group credibility.
The song exists on multiple levels. Of course, it shows the group being true to their roots, but in addition, it speaks directly to Adidas as to why the group, and the song for that matter, would be a great medium to sink their money into. For instance, it mentions Live Aid, the number of concerts the group puts on, their favorite colors, and the admiration of a homeboy who owns several pairs of shoes. It mentions the name Adidas nearly 22 times.
This little bit of entrepanuerialism aided both parties. Run-DMC got even more mainstream acceptance, while Adidas got precedence in the urban market. It was also a very long lasting deal, one that became iconic for both parties. But in addition, it also allowed the listeners of the music to buy into the product. Wearing Adidas shoes without laces became a manner to show solidarity with not just Run-DMC, but the hip hop community as a whole. It was no longer just music that was for sale, but a lifestyle to boot. This played right into Russell Simmon’s eventual emergence into Phat Farm and other endeavors, while staying away from the actual music scene (He supposedly admitted current music trends have long since passed him by). But, he’s promoting a lifestyle, one that he claims is moving away from youth counter-culture, and into the mainstream. Indeed, he claims Phat Farm is more up-scale. What kids who like rap would wear once they grew up, but refuse to adopt suits and ties (once again, his words, not mine). However, regardless of the aesthetic, he is using the principles which helped him achieve success with Run-DMC and Def Jam in the first place.
It is interesting Simmons’ personal definition of hip hop includes the phrase “mainstream culture.” However, judging by his current activities, it makes sense. His importance placed upon branding and maintaining product integrity is more akin to a Donald Trump than an opportunistic hype man. Once again, his retroactive justification of his past activities through current credo fits into traditional American economic activities.
Another defining of terms: traditional American economic values. Or aspirations, rather than values. Entrepanerialism, for one. The idea an individual, through sheer determination, skill, and luck, can carve out a better life for themselves. It also links to coming from authentic poverty or a legit bad situation, which makes their elevation all the more impressive. Though both Simmons’ came from a comfortable two parent working class existence, albeit quite black, it was nowhere near as desperate as other places. Indeed, Run-DMC rapped often of going to school and staying away from street activities. However, they always prefaced their rhymes by “knowing where the bad stuff went on.” Though they weren’t gangsters, they came to embody the persona of what the nation feared. For instance they were held responsible for the Long Beach incident even though they hadn’t yet gone on stage, and had to defend their lyrics, mainly from Kurtis Blow, who was disgruntled in the first place.
Anyway, another traditional American value personified by Simmons is self-actualization. Because of the sheer emphasis placed upon the appearance, it was clear Simmons was not just fashioning himself as a successful individual, but the groups he managed as well. It was easier to claim success already rather than “pay your dues” as the case may be. It also fits quite well into hip hop’s overall element of bragging and not actually just doing something. For instance, a rapper can use an entire song to rap about how hard he’s going to hit you or how smooth his rhymes are, while all the while proving his point. It’s almost a narrative (out of the time period, but “Can’t Nobody Do It Better” by Keith Murray springs to mine. He calls himself a gifted lyricist rather than letting someone else do it.) I guess that’s the other part of the whole Protestant work ethic and self-realization element of rap, you heap praises upon yourself instead of waiting for someone else. So even though they were claiming hard work and hustling, all they were doing is claiming it, not actually doing it. However, because of the success they found by already claiming prior success, their claims got validation. I see the parallel to Buffalo Bill wherein he became the standard by all other Wild West cowboys were measured by, even though he wasn’t actually a part of the Wild West scene. It’s all about claiming, getting first dibs on the experience. It’s a very personal and immensely competitive field, as exemplified by battle rapping being central to the music’s culture. Interestingly enough, Run-DMC was not engaged in any major rap feuds, but the contention between themselves and the whole Russell dynamic could substitute. Also, the claim LL Cool J copied their style.
So mix this whole brew together and it only seems like a manner of time before a Russell Simmons would fuse the music with economics and make himself personally wealthy. Sure the artists he managed didn’t have the best deals. And he took a lot of creative control over them. Plus, there was a lot of resentment for his control over Run DMC even though they were signed with another label. But Russell needed Run-DMC, since that was his bread and butter for a long time. It allowed him to make Def-Jam, and Phat Farm, and his whole empire. His name as a business icon is pretty much due to Run-DMC. (Insert that quote by Run that Run-DMC actually had five members: Run, DMC, Jam Master Jay, Russell, and God.)
But it all stems from his involvement with Run-DMC and Def Jam. It’s also funny how those two have become so linked, even though Run-DMC was never on Def Jam, but in the collective consciousness, a lot of people just assume that’s where Run-DMC was. So what made this deal with Adidas so important? Well, I’m arguing it’s what made Russell Simmons truly break that wall. It was not just widespread exposure, but also a level of acceptance as well. It was quite a bit of money, sure. Most of the money went to Russell, but that’s to be expected. However, it wasn’t just exposure of the band; it was exposure of the band as a brand. It allowed a much higher level of visibility and availability for people to buy into the hip hop lifestyle. That’s what really sustained them; it wasn’t just the music, but the manner by which people could tangibly identify with the music and the culture. And it was mainstream, that’s the beauty of it. Adidas was not primarily a urban lifestyles company, nor did the deal change their direction that much (indeed, they’re still primarily known as athletic and soccer equipment, not that huge of an urban following aside from nostalgia for Run DMC. That’s another big point, Run-DMC and Adidas are pretty much only synonymous with each other. Sure, Adidas has sponsored other rappers, and Run spends a lot of his time hawking Phat Farm shoes, but there isn’t the same connection with any other product. It truly is unique in that regard). But the deal with Run-DMC opened up the urban market to Adidas, and the mainstream market to Run-DMC. It was a perfectly mutually beneficial deal; neither side got the short end of that stick. A uniquely win-win all around.
The particulars of the deal are also influenced by the purposeful misremembering of history. For instance, current interviews by DMC claim Run’s exclamation to call for the taking off of the audience’s Adidas to be unique to the Madison Square Garden concert, while information at the time is fairly persuasive in arguing it was a regular bit of their shows, and that it had been filmed in Philadelphia by Lyor Cohen and sent to Adidas. Also, DMC mentions Russell, inspired by Run’s improvisation to quickly run and hustle an endorsement deal. This actually fits the hip hop practice of claiming an actually lengthy action was easy (and counter-intuitive, since rappers like to claim their extreme work ethic when things hadn’t happened yet. It’s pretty much a purposeful reversal of reality). The narrative works better if it’s Russell who scores the Adidas deal, not members of his Rush Management team. The participants are probably well aware of the effectiveness of the story and have in time; either willfully or subconsciously altered the tale of the endorsement so it becomes a much larger and clearer event. At the writing of their official biography, there was no idea the deal with Adidas would become so iconic, so it wasn’t treated that relevantly. However, as time passed, the event became much more singular. It was the world’s greatest arena, in their hometown, and it was spur of the moment, a much better story.
This idea is the least expanded upon, but it would probably get to how rappers now will mention products in their songs and get some what disappointed when they aren’t paid. Also, it’s how some companies try to get away from appealing to urban markets. It’s an interesting concept, but it needs to be expanded. Alright, let’s take this expansion of the thesis another direction. Russell Simmons is already the preliminary figure in the “My Adidas” aspect, in that it’s actually about his management style at Rush management. What if we expanded into Def Jam and Phat Farm, which were two extensions of his prowess with the hip hop market? Granted, Def Jam is a concurrent development with Run-DMC, but it mixes in Rick Rubin, and also builds on his reputation. Indeed, even though the two were never truly linked, the assumption was there. But his hands on management style was pretty key to the label’s success, but also its challenges. Artists weren’t exactly appreciative of his taking all their money. Indeed, I remember complaints how it seemed Russell had his hands into everything, as if all his hands were taking all your cut. In his defense, he claimed the big record companies were taking his. But still, it might be interesting to expand in the thesis into
criticism of Russell’s style. Big example, Jay always had problems with the IRS. Even after his murder, money had to be raised to pay off his house and provide for his kids’ education. And it was a public fund-raiser, even though Russell and Lyor could have easily cut a check. Furthermore, why was he in this predicament in the first place? Most people claim he was never flashy, and the material he had was modest considering someone of his fame. But if Run-DMC was such a success, should he have been paid? Also, Jay was signed to Def Jam, but Run and DMC were on Profile. Perhaps Jay got less lucrative deal? It’s amazing how the artists represented by Simmons and on Def Jam would never straight up criticize his taking a large cut, but the resentment is there. Of course, isn’t that every artist and their management? Ronin Ro suggests Russell was simply doing the best he could with the current situation. And there’s an element of truth to that, I suppose. There was no precedence for getting rap truly out there to a widespread mainstream audience. Plus, if you get down to it, pretty much any regional rap that developed outside of New York was due to these artists getting very wide exposure. It seems simple, but the most mainstream artists had the most effect. Sure, the “sell outs” might have been inspired by the Busy Bees and Kool Moe Dees of the world, but since they got the widest exposure first, they became the originators.
But all that exposure comes from Russell’s desire to make himself wealthy, to be frank. And that’s not a bad thing. Heck, it’s a very American thing to do. America is all about presenting itself as the land of opportunity; and Russell Simmons probably bought into that myth pretty hard. As such, it provides justification for a lot of his more selfish actions. It also fits into a greater American narrative. He’s a success story; he came from nothing to make something that most people were giving away for free. But the beauty of it comes in that it’s a self-told success story. He’s the guy guiding his narrative. As such, he’d be very image conscious, as evidenced by his branding and attention to visual appearance. And that’s why clothing makes such a likely extension of his branding.
Clothing isn’t as open to interpretation as other elements. It’s very appearance based, but it makes sense, since it’s linked to commercialization and product placement. His name became the product, hence why they call Phat Farm an urban lifestyles company, not a rap music clothing label. But judging by Russell’s attempt to ensure a Phat Farm racing jacket wouldn’t be worn by bums, he tries to be purposefully limiting.
So yeah, that's what it is now. All about economics and self-actualization through branding. I'll be really surprised if anyone actually reads this.
Saturday, December 6, 2008
And We're Back!
So the semester is over. Finally. Sorry that I haven't updated as much as I'm prone to, but between school and work, I haven't had much time for anything else. However, I now actually have some free time on my hands.
Anyway, I've got some great news. I get to start my thesis next semester, with my topic declared viable, and with the professor I wanted!!!
Yeah, that's incredibly dorky news, but I suppose everyone's inner history geek gets its day.
So for the duration of this break, I will be traveling to Houston, Shreveport, and New Orleans (hopefully to catch a Hornets game) as well as doing preliminary research for my thesis. I might post the prospectus up here just in the unlikely event anyone would be interested.
Anyway, I've got some great news. I get to start my thesis next semester, with my topic declared viable, and with the professor I wanted!!!
Yeah, that's incredibly dorky news, but I suppose everyone's inner history geek gets its day.
So for the duration of this break, I will be traveling to Houston, Shreveport, and New Orleans (hopefully to catch a Hornets game) as well as doing preliminary research for my thesis. I might post the prospectus up here just in the unlikely event anyone would be interested.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
A Few of my Favorite Rap Things
So last night, the obtainment of rap beats came up. Needless to say, I mentioned the easiest manner to get some killer ones was to take musical elements of stuff you like and blend it together. For example, take the best 7 seconds of a disco song, speed it up, add some drums, and volia, an awesome beat all your own.
Of course, this topic got me thinking about my own favorite musical/rap elements I would love to blend one day. (Among many other things, "Rap Producer" has always been one of my dream jobs. Seriously, I enjoy rap producers more than rappers themselves)
And without further ado, a long list no one is actually going read, but will probably rate has my favorite blog post ever. The elements of my hypothetical greatest rap song ever. (Also, mentions of "Biscuits and Kool-Aid," the single I cut a few years back, will be kept to a minimum)
1. The Base
Personally, I think the theme song to "What's Happening" is criminally underused as a rap sample. Seriously, that "bawm, bam bam bawm" would be killer on some track. So on my hypothetical rap song, I think that's going to be the base. Like the bouncy beginning and some of the horn section.
2. Drums
Okay, tribal is a tad overdone. So is that Dwahli-stuff that was popular a few years back. But, I don't want to go minimalist or anything. I mean, "What's Happening" in the background, it's brassy and large. So, let's go a Steel Drum trill on the 3rd beat of every other measure. It's noticable, but not overtly so.
3. Random sound cue.
Though it's already heavily, HEAVILY sampled, the keyboards from "Gypsy Woman" are like my favorite intro in music. Especially when it shifts into that lower key on the "rackety piano" section about 2 minutes in. So that's going to come into play in my hypothetical rap track. Plus, it could sync up nicely to the "What's Happening" theme. Put that on a loop.
4. The Breakdown.
Though convention might tell you otherwise, my favorite Britney Spears song is not "Oops, I Did It Again." In all actuality, my all-time favorite Britney thing she's ever done is the 3rd minute of "Boys." (The non-Neptunes Remix version. I've got mad love for Pharell and Chad, but they got rid of the song's best part) So this new joint is going to have a 3rd minute breakdown, with an "Ooomm...POP!" 1,2 drum beat. Maybe throw in a little chorus, like a "Sexy, sexy...ha-HA!" a la "Change Clothes," right before the final verse, when I really throw it down.
5. Producer shout-out.
This is the most important part. Seriously, my all-time most recongizable part of a track is the producer/artist shout out. Like one or two words, but it's a seal of approval. Of course, now I'm going to have to list my all-time faves:
"Luda!" (Ludacris. "Why Don't We Fall In Love?" remix, Anmarie)
"I go by the name of Swizz Beatz the monsta!" (Swizz Beats. "Bring 'em Out", T.I.)
"Collipark!" (Mr. Collipark. "Promise Ring", Tiffany Evans)
"This has been...a hot buttered production...now time for some hot buttered seduction...oh yeah!" (Self. "Biscuits and Kool-Aid." Studakris. Yeah, I couldn't help myself)
"Dip-set" (A little understated)(Juelz Santana. "There's Nothing" remix, Sean Kingston)
"JUST BLAZE!" (Just Blaze. The original. The one that made me fall in love with the concept.)
"Woo!" (Nelly. Every Nelly song ever)
Now let's see how this hypothetical track stands up against my pick for the greatest rap song of all time, "Izzo" produced by a young and unknown Kanye West.
Okay, "Izzo" just blew it out of the water. However, you might be thinking to yourself, "Izzo" does not contain a producer shout-out." Ah ha! You are wrong there. During the Breakdown section following Jay's last verse, in the music video, Kanye West pulls off the greatest producer appearance of all time. Flanked by three girls, he scrolls down the tattoo on the underside of his arm, and then shimmies a bit. Perfect.
Seriously, I know wedding photographs have to be taken still. But. If I get the chance to have a "wedding 3-second clip" be taken, I'm totally getting 3 bridesmaids to flank me as I do the Kayne move. It's seriously that awesome.
So. I think I've abandoned what little readership I have with this post.
Of course, this topic got me thinking about my own favorite musical/rap elements I would love to blend one day. (Among many other things, "Rap Producer" has always been one of my dream jobs. Seriously, I enjoy rap producers more than rappers themselves)
And without further ado, a long list no one is actually going read, but will probably rate has my favorite blog post ever. The elements of my hypothetical greatest rap song ever. (Also, mentions of "Biscuits and Kool-Aid," the single I cut a few years back, will be kept to a minimum)
1. The Base
Personally, I think the theme song to "What's Happening" is criminally underused as a rap sample. Seriously, that "bawm, bam bam bawm" would be killer on some track. So on my hypothetical rap song, I think that's going to be the base. Like the bouncy beginning and some of the horn section.
2. Drums
Okay, tribal is a tad overdone. So is that Dwahli-stuff that was popular a few years back. But, I don't want to go minimalist or anything. I mean, "What's Happening" in the background, it's brassy and large. So, let's go a Steel Drum trill on the 3rd beat of every other measure. It's noticable, but not overtly so.
3. Random sound cue.
Though it's already heavily, HEAVILY sampled, the keyboards from "Gypsy Woman" are like my favorite intro in music. Especially when it shifts into that lower key on the "rackety piano" section about 2 minutes in. So that's going to come into play in my hypothetical rap track. Plus, it could sync up nicely to the "What's Happening" theme. Put that on a loop.
4. The Breakdown.
Though convention might tell you otherwise, my favorite Britney Spears song is not "Oops, I Did It Again." In all actuality, my all-time favorite Britney thing she's ever done is the 3rd minute of "Boys." (The non-Neptunes Remix version. I've got mad love for Pharell and Chad, but they got rid of the song's best part) So this new joint is going to have a 3rd minute breakdown, with an "Ooomm...POP!" 1,2 drum beat. Maybe throw in a little chorus, like a "Sexy, sexy...ha-HA!" a la "Change Clothes," right before the final verse, when I really throw it down.
5. Producer shout-out.
This is the most important part. Seriously, my all-time most recongizable part of a track is the producer/artist shout out. Like one or two words, but it's a seal of approval. Of course, now I'm going to have to list my all-time faves:
"Luda!" (Ludacris. "Why Don't We Fall In Love?" remix, Anmarie)
"I go by the name of Swizz Beatz the monsta!" (Swizz Beats. "Bring 'em Out", T.I.)
"Collipark!" (Mr. Collipark. "Promise Ring", Tiffany Evans)
"This has been...a hot buttered production...now time for some hot buttered seduction...oh yeah!" (Self. "Biscuits and Kool-Aid." Studakris. Yeah, I couldn't help myself)
"Dip-set" (A little understated)(Juelz Santana. "There's Nothing" remix, Sean Kingston)
"JUST BLAZE!" (Just Blaze. The original. The one that made me fall in love with the concept.)
"Woo!" (Nelly. Every Nelly song ever)
Now let's see how this hypothetical track stands up against my pick for the greatest rap song of all time, "Izzo" produced by a young and unknown Kanye West.
Okay, "Izzo" just blew it out of the water. However, you might be thinking to yourself, "Izzo" does not contain a producer shout-out." Ah ha! You are wrong there. During the Breakdown section following Jay's last verse, in the music video, Kanye West pulls off the greatest producer appearance of all time. Flanked by three girls, he scrolls down the tattoo on the underside of his arm, and then shimmies a bit. Perfect.
Seriously, I know wedding photographs have to be taken still. But. If I get the chance to have a "wedding 3-second clip" be taken, I'm totally getting 3 bridesmaids to flank me as I do the Kayne move. It's seriously that awesome.
So. I think I've abandoned what little readership I have with this post.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
